Difference between revisions of "User talk:Peter Z."

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday April 28, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
(The Word According to Wikipedia)
(removed)
 
(96 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[http://www.mywikibiz.com/Special:Emailuser/Peter_Z. Email]
 
== My Discussion Page ==
 
== My Discussion Page ==
−
[[Image:Sunset-Road To Moora.jpg]]
 
  
 
{{Greeting}}
 
{{Greeting}}
−
 
−
 
 
'''Thanks'''-Peter Z
 
'''Thanks'''-Peter Z
  
−
== Wikipedia’s Communist Propaganda Articles-Work Space==
+
----
  
−
Is Wikipedia taking on a darker tone? Where are the ethical and moral issues involved in creating a feel good article about a man who played a major role in these historicial events? How many more articles are being written within Wikipedia that are just the point of view of its Editors (political, in this case).  This is not encyclopedic work, pure and simple.
+
== Wikikpedia Review ==
−
Is this type of phenomenon happening with other articles. Quite possible!
 
  
−
== The Word According to Wikipedia ==
+
Hi this is good - see if you can edit the talk pages of the parent article. If not, leave something in my talk directory and I will edit it in. Do you not belong to [http://wikipediareview.com/ Wikikpedia Review]? That is the place where all the dirt is dished, these days. There is a major scandal going on at the moment. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 11:56, 8 October 2009 (PDT)
−
According to Wikipedia if a Commander happens to loss 100 000 POWs after WW2 this information is  not to be mention in his biography. Sixty years latter it was established that were murdered and place in old mine shafts and caves.
+
:: Hm mm, there seems to be a lot more of dirt being dished out than I realized. Thanks for that! [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 19:49, 9 October 2009 (PDT)
−
== Notes on References ==
 
−
*'''Encyclopaedia Britannica'''-The article is written post ''Berlin Wall'' but it's thin in terms of information, but does not hold back on economic realities ''"At his death, the '''state treasury''' was '''empty'''"'' The Wiki article has Encyclopaedia Britannica  under its ''Notes'' section as it's source, it might be just cosmetic.
 
−
*'''BBC''' UK/History by Tim Judah. The article is also written  in the post ''Berlin Wall'' world. The Wiki article '''does not''' have the [[BBC]] as it's '''source'''.
 
−
:Both encyclopaedic articles clearly state:
 
  
−
:1. Josip Broz Tito’s failure in adressing ethnic tensions of the former Yugoslavia;
+
== Hi ==
  
−
:2. Failure in the economic management of the former of Yugoslavia;
+
Hi - I have reorganised your article somewhat by placing a parent article in mainspace (click the link for 'parent article'), which will contain links to all the bad historyarticles in Wikipedia. I have moved and edited material in your article and placed it in the parent article.  The child article will then be expressly about the former Yugoslavia and its history, or rather, about the treatment in the Wikipedia articles compared to the modern independent scholarly view. I have looked at some of the Wikipedia articles and you seem to have stumbled upon a real can of worms. Well done. I have edited the article to remove some of the strident turns of phrase you have used - to make a really strong and forceful case it is necessary to speak quieter, rather than louder. Regards [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:16, 4 October 2009 (PDT)
−
 
+
: PS See my links about Bleiburg [http://www.mywikibiz.com/User_talk:Ockham/Wikipedia_%26_Political_Agendas#The_Bleiberg_massacre] - the edits by 'Direktor' are laughable. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:43, 4 October 2009 (PDT)
−
*'''Ivo Goldstein''': 'Croatia A History', a Mc Gill Queen’s University Press Publication.
 
−
 
 
−
This is a factual statement, written in Ivo Goldstein: 'Croatia A History'. Josip Broz and his fellow communist were committing economic management suicide. The Wiki article does not have Ivo Goldstein  as it's source.
 
−
 
 
−
'''Note''': Ivo Goldstein is a Professor at the University of Zagreb
 
−
The University of Zagreb [http://www.unizg.hr/homepage/] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Zagreb] (1669) is the oldest and biggest university in South-Eastern Europe. The university  has 29 faculties, three art academies and the Centre for Croatian Studies. With its comprehensive programmes and over 50,000 full-time undergraduate and postgraduate students. The University is the strongest teaching institution in Croatia.  It offers a wide range of academic degree courses leading to Bachelor's, Master's and Doctoral degrees in the following fields: Arts, Biomedicine, Biotechnology, Engineering, Humanities, Natural and Social Sciences.
 
−
== Wikipedia & Political Agendas ==
 
−
 
 
−
I would like to expand the '''parent article''' with how the political spin is done on Wiki (which I'm going to add later). This could apply to all articles (you have already started on something similar, this is-'''great''').
 
 
   
 
   
−
Also the way Wiki is being run from within. Is it becoming more like George Orwell's  "1984 & Animal Farm" (with every passing day)? That is if you agree with this. 
 
  
−
Wiki's future and how this is going to affect information (political info & other) on the Internet (& society). Does it need to have a moral obligation (Yes) ?
+
I can see this is all coming on nicely! I am not always around but feel free to leave a message. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 05:18, 21 October 2009 (PDT)
−
 
 
−
Wiki's editorial style of work ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dalmatia]-scroll down to Balkanic business/Dalmatia not exactly Croatia) ''is this the way to build an encyclopedia''?
 
−
 
−
The Four Corners might not be suitable for the article?  [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 19:22, 6 October 2009 (PDT)
 
−
: Hi this is good - see if you can edit the talk pages of the parent article.  If not, leave something in my talk directory and I will edit it in.  Do you not belong to [http://wikipediareview.com/ Wikikpedia Review]?  That is the place where all the dirt is dished, these days.  There is a major scandal going on at the moment. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 11:56, 8 October 2009 (PDT)
 
−
:: Hm mm, there seems to be a lot more of dirt being dished out than I realized. Thanks for that! [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 19:49, 9 October 2009 (PDT)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
'''Wiki Balkan Talk Page Drama!!!''':
 
  
−
Information on ''www.spiritus-temporis.com''
+
== Oh dear ==
  
−
War crimes Under Tito (Commanded all partisans and Communists)
+
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sir_Floyd Oh dear].  Toddst is an idiot, believe me. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 16:53, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
  
−
''"The Bleiburg massacre occurred near to the end of World War II, during May 1945. It is named after the village of Bleiburg on the Austrian-Slovenian border, near where the massacre began. It involved mass murder of Croatian soldiers and civilians who were fleeing from the defeated Independent State of Croatia, a puppet state of the Nazi regime in Germany. The atrocities were a reprisal against the real or alleged members or collaborators of the fascist regime, by the communist Yugoslav partisan army, presumably with the full knowledge of their supreme commander Josip Broz Tito, who was himself half-Croatian.''
+
== FYI ==
  
−
''Although a still undefined number of Croatian soldiers died during a series of battles and skirmishes, it is generally accepted that the vast portion of violent deaths were the result of executions that lasted at least two weeks after the cessation of hostilities. The victims were Croatian soldiers and '''civilians''', executed '''without trial''' as an act of vengeance for the crimes committed by the Ustasi regime in Croatian-controlled territories during World War II — frequently in overtly gruesome manner ('''mass rape''' and subsequent '''killing by stoning of women'''; beheading of Croatian disarmed soldiers). Murder continued in nearby Slovenia, and it is hard to estimate the number of victims in Bleiburg field, compared to those later found in the trenches in the Maribor area and other numerous pits in Slovenia. Many captives were sent on a death march further into Yugoslav territory.''
+
FYI, see [http://www.mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Yagan_Memorial&diff=121814&oldid=120900 this edit], which was prompted by an e-mail request to me. The page is unlocked now, so you'd need to make an edit, any edit, to re-lock it to yourself. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 20:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 +
:Thanks MyWikiBiz! [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 01:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
  
−
''Croatian political emigration, as well as other sources related to the Cossacks, had published numerous testimonies on the atrocities and British involvement in the affair (interestingly enough, British archives on the Operation Keelhaul tragedy are still sealed), but their publications have received little attention since communist Yugoslavia was the West's protege and the buffer-zone to the Soviets in the post-war period."''
+
== Concerning Racism and Wikipedia ==
  
−
Now how can the leadership of the partisans not be responsible for these events? May be they just had a bad day at one of there Communists Party meetings. Sir Floyd (talk) 04:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
+
Peter,
  
−
:Yeah, poor Nazis and fascists. After they've brutally murdered 2 million Yugoslavs in 4 years the partisan's should've simply pardoned them for misbehaving. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 11:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
+
As you might have noticed, the material on that page is by [[Gregory Kohs]]. If you haven't done so yet, I'm sure he would appreciate if you drop him a line or two. You seemed to have a special concern for the history rewriting and other Balkan complex issues. These should be a no brainer if people respect the principle of neutrality. Even if there were ten different views of the same events they should all be presented together with their sources. Unfortunately, a lot of people don't have the foggiest idea of what that means. They believe that there is one NPOV, and that one and only that one should be described as historic fact. Even more unfortunate is the inability of the sysops to uphold that principle, mostly because they are biased themselves.
  
−
::The key word in your post being "presumably". :) Find yourself another one of your crappy "forums" to talk about your presumptions. Just forget about this, Luigi/Brunodam, you're not annoying anyone - you're just turning out amusing. I think I'll file a checkuser in an hour or so, you'd better believe it when I say I'll delete everything you wrote if you're a sock. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 15:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
+
My work is far from complete. There are other topics that I still have not approached. If you believe you have any material that fits into what I'm trying to develop, please feel free to edit and contribute.
  
−
::::Whitewashing? As I understand it, Tito was a fairly controversial leader, whose political legacy is still under debate by scholars. What I don't understand is why this article is devoid of any discussion of this scholarly contention. It seems this article is more focused towards listing Tito's awards than presenting any meaningful scholarly analysis of the man. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
+
Sincerely,
  
−
'''Note''': Ivan Štambuk statement is very interesting. It might be there just for the benefit of the other Editors, who might not know nothing about the historical events of WW2. This happens a lot with the Balkan Editors (something to think about). [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 00:41, 10 October 2009 (PDT)
+
Virgilio A. P. Machado
  
−
'''Wiki's Encyclopedic Editors Style of Communication''':
+
[[User:Vapmachado|vapmachado]] <sup>[[User talk:Vapmachado|msgs.cw]]</sup> 02:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
  
−
*Hoping that your essays will attract other, real users and start a fake dispute about a non-existing controversy? Nice try... -DIREKTOR 6 August 2009
+
== best ==
−
*Why in the world would I want to ban you? You're wacky, you're a lot of fun - I like that! :D And since even a brain-dead, brutish Slav communist can see through your sockpuppet "disguise", you're really not a problem.DIREKTOR 6 August 2009
 
−
*Don't you worry Rex old boy, "my menace" is here to stay.It only gets more annoying and "menacing" as the months and years go by... xD gosh I'm evil.-DIREKTOR, 14 August 2009
 
−
*My very well sourced propaganda, Rex, lets not forget. With your sock report I doubt you'll have to endure the um..."suffering" for much longer. ;) -DIREKTOR  14 August 2009
 
−
'''Note''': This communication is towards a new Editor who is not a Shockpuppet. Editor DIREKTOR is being considered (by some in Wiki) to be nominated for Admi. Editor DIREKTOR has won "The Barnstar of Diplomacy" Award!
 
  
−
== Hi ==
+
ciao, I am your old Italian friend of wikipedia: you are the best editor of ex Yugoslavia related articles! Your account -Sir Floyd- is signature which means guarantee of documentation and competence: congratulations for your articles in this site! Further, I have some relatives in Australia: I admire Australian people and I like Australian rules football--[[User:Ziogemmo|Ziogemmo]] 14:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
−
 
 
−
Hi - I have reorganised your article somewhat by placing a parent article in mainspace (click the link for 'parent article'), which will contain links to all the bad historyarticles in Wikipedia.  I have moved and edited material in your article and placed it in the parent article.  The child article will then be expressly about the former Yugoslavia and its history, or rather, about the treatment in the Wikipedia articles compared to the modern independent scholarly view.  I have looked at some of the Wikipedia articles and you seem to have stumbled upon a real can of worms.  Well done. I have edited the article to remove some of the strident turns of phrase you have used - to make a really strong and forceful case it is necessary to speak quieter, rather than louder. Regards [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:16, 4 October 2009 (PDT)
 
−
: PS See my links about Bleiburg [http://www.mywikibiz.com/User_talk:Ockham/Wikipedia_%26_Political_Agendas#The_Bleiberg_massacre] - the edits by 'Direktor' are laughable. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 04:43, 4 October 2009 (PDT)
 
−
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
== Hi ==
 
−
 
 
−
I can see this is all coming on nicely!  I am not always around but feel free to leave a message. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 05:18, 21 October 2009 (PDT)
 

Latest revision as of 06:29, 24 September 2022

Email

My Discussion Page

Welcome!

Hi Peter Z., welcome to MyWikiBiz. We're happy that you've taken the steps to become a member of our site. MyWikiBiz is a directory where any person, any company, any product, or any thing can author their own legacy. We seek to provide the space for 265 million entities. Our registered editors like you have generated over 60,000 pages so far -- help keep that number growing with an article about yourself, your business, your industry, your favorite product, hobby, or organization. Since 2008, MyWikiBiz.com has served up over 1 million page views. Get started authoring your legacy today!

Helpful tips

Here are some tips on how to create a Directory listing and take advantage of the semantic web features we have in place:

  • You may write as an opinionated advocate in the Directory -- neutral view is not required. You can sell products, promote videos, upload documents, even host your own Google AdSense ads. This auto-fill form will guide you through creating a very basic directory listing right now.
  • Because MyWikiBiz supports Semantic Web technology, search engine results are highly optimized. Internal searches can also be performed that wouldn't be possible on Google, MySpace, or Wikipedia.

A few favorite pages that might help acquaint a new user with the possibilities are found among the Demonstration links, or in these articles written by independent reviewers.

E-mail updates

If you would like a daily e-mail notice of what has been created or updated on MyWikiBiz.com, just complete this form. <embed>

<form style="border:1px solid #ccc;padding:3px;text-align:center;" action="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverify" method="post" target="popupwindow" onsubmit="window.open('http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=2001427', 'popupwindow', 'scrollbars=yes,width=550,height=520');return true">

Enter your email address:

<input type="text" style="width:140px" name="email"/>

<input type="hidden" value="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~e?ffid=2001427" name="url"/><input type="hidden" value="MyWikiBiz" name="title"/><input type="hidden" name="loc" value="en_US"/><input type="submit" value="Subscribe" />

Delivered by <a href="http://www.feedburner.com" target="_blank">FeedBurner</a>

</form>

</embed>

Share this page!

<sharethis /> Thanks-Peter Z

Wikikpedia Review

Hi this is good - see if you can edit the talk pages of the parent article. If not, leave something in my talk directory and I will edit it in. Do you not belong to Wikikpedia Review? That is the place where all the dirt is dished, these days. There is a major scandal going on at the moment. Ockham 11:56, 8 October 2009 (PDT)

Hm mm, there seems to be a lot more of dirt being dished out than I realized. Thanks for that! Peter Z. 19:49, 9 October 2009 (PDT)

Hi

Hi - I have reorganised your article somewhat by placing a parent article in mainspace (click the link for 'parent article'), which will contain links to all the bad historyarticles in Wikipedia. I have moved and edited material in your article and placed it in the parent article. The child article will then be expressly about the former Yugoslavia and its history, or rather, about the treatment in the Wikipedia articles compared to the modern independent scholarly view. I have looked at some of the Wikipedia articles and you seem to have stumbled upon a real can of worms. Well done. I have edited the article to remove some of the strident turns of phrase you have used - to make a really strong and forceful case it is necessary to speak quieter, rather than louder. Regards Ockham 04:16, 4 October 2009 (PDT)

PS See my links about Bleiburg [1] - the edits by 'Direktor' are laughable. Ockham 04:43, 4 October 2009 (PDT)


I can see this is all coming on nicely! I am not always around but feel free to leave a message. Ockham 05:18, 21 October 2009 (PDT)

Oh dear

Oh dear. Toddst is an idiot, believe me. Ockham 16:53, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

FYI

FYI, see this edit, which was prompted by an e-mail request to me. The page is unlocked now, so you'd need to make an edit, any edit, to re-lock it to yourself. -- MyWikiBiz 20:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks MyWikiBiz! Peter Z. 01:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Concerning Racism and Wikipedia

Peter,

As you might have noticed, the material on that page is by Gregory Kohs. If you haven't done so yet, I'm sure he would appreciate if you drop him a line or two. You seemed to have a special concern for the history rewriting and other Balkan complex issues. These should be a no brainer if people respect the principle of neutrality. Even if there were ten different views of the same events they should all be presented together with their sources. Unfortunately, a lot of people don't have the foggiest idea of what that means. They believe that there is one NPOV, and that one and only that one should be described as historic fact. Even more unfortunate is the inability of the sysops to uphold that principle, mostly because they are biased themselves.

My work is far from complete. There are other topics that I still have not approached. If you believe you have any material that fits into what I'm trying to develop, please feel free to edit and contribute.

Sincerely,

Virgilio A. P. Machado

vapmachado msgs.cw 02:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

best

ciao, I am your old Italian friend of wikipedia: you are the best editor of ex Yugoslavia related articles! Your account -Sir Floyd- is signature which means guarantee of documentation and competence: congratulations for your articles in this site! Further, I have some relatives in Australia: I admire Australian people and I like Australian rules football--Ziogemmo 14:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Peter_Z.&oldid=480572"