Search results

...inite set, a countably infinite set, or given by axiom schemata. A formal grammar recursively defines the expressions and well-formed formulas (wffs) of the * Depending on the precise formal grammar or the grammar formalism that is being used, syntactic auxiliaries like the left parenthes

# [[Continuous predicate]] | align="right" | 9 || [[Continuous predicate]]

...n]]'' is in turn defined as "a [[definition]] of the [[predicate (grammar)|predicate]] '… is true' for a language that satisfies ''[[convention T]]' ...'. This judgment is typically expressed in the form of a specific ''truth predicate'', whose positive application to a sign asserts that the sign is true.

...n]]'' is in turn defined as "a [[definition]] of the [[predicate (grammar)|predicate]] '… is true' for a language that satisfies ''[[convention T]]' ...'. This judgment is typically expressed in the form of a specific ''truth predicate'', whose positive application to a sign asserts that the sign is true.

...were it not for hypostatic abstraction, there could be no generality of a predicate, since a sign which should make its interpreter its deputy to determine its ...e “sum of synthetical propositions in which the symbol is subject or predicate”, antecedent or consequent. The word “symbol” is here em

...ussions to do with the question of whether a per se proposition (one whose predicate is included in the subject, such as 'every man is an animal') is true when ...alled because they wrote on the mode of signifying. Their aim was to make grammar a science in Aristotle's sense, i.e. to explain it, not just to describe it

...fines signhood in ''[[logic of relatives|relative terms]]'', by means of a predicate with three places. In this definition, signhood is a role in a [[triadic r ...has three ''logical subjects''. We regard it as a mere affair of English grammar that there are six ways of expressing this: <br>

...par with each other, in distinction to having ''color'' be a higher order predicate than ''red''. ...verses of discourse. That is more or less tantamount to the ''first order predicate calculus'', or the ''logic of quantified propositions''. However, if we ar

...lain that ''mammals'' may be substituted for this term. Suppose it is the predicate of a sentence, and that we know that something is either a man or a horse o ...umerated by a long conjunction of terms, we may be sure that this compound predicate may be replaced by a simple one. And if only one simple one is known in wh

or a generative predicate, whose extension generates the trajectory of of (a possibly higher order) model theory. For example, the predicate

| 1. Speculative Grammar (= the theory of signs) |'Essential Predication': in which the predicate is wholly contained in the

...t theory is as superficial and simplistic as their use of Transformational Grammar, Automata Theory and epistemological theory. The distinction between (pure) ...netic Epistemology any more than it is based on Chomskyan Transformational Grammar. Most of the elements that NLP claims as its intellectual antecedents are i

...g this system of levels in an abstract manner, in such a way that a simple grammar will result when this complex of abstract structures is given an interpreta ...programming in the Horn clause subset of logic. My own incursions through predicate calculus theorem proving and my attempts to size up the computational compl

| align="right" | 9 || [[Continuous predicate]] | align="right" | 7 || [[Two-level grammar]]

| in an abstract manner, in such a way that a simple grammar will result when this ...programming in the Horn clause subset of logic. My own incursions through predicate calculus theorem proving and my attempts to size up the computational compl

...ng, a real object is now analogous to an extended property or a generative predicate, whose extension generates the trajectory of its momentary instances or the ...ents of (a possibly higher order) model theory. For example, consider the predicate <math>P : J \to \mathbb{B}\!</math> defined by the following equivalence:

dedicate its own predicate to each one of them, imposing only the parts of y as the pieces of x. Just by way of a grammar school

07:34 < TheDruId> and poor grammar to boot. 10:52 < ToAruShiroiNeko> predicate logic requires it