Search results
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday April 29, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
- ===Aug — Extensions Of Logical Graphs=== ===Jul — Reflective Extension Of Logical Graphs===7 KB (890 words) - 14:20, 12 June 2009
- * [[Directory:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Futures Of Logical Graphs|Futures Of Logical Graphs]] * [[Laws of Form]]2 KB (182 words) - 04:04, 19 June 2007
- A '''descriptive science''', also called a '''special science''', is a form of [[inquiry]], typically involving a community of inquiry and its accumula ===Logical operators===5 KB (556 words) - 16:15, 4 November 2020
- A '''normative science''' is a form of [[inquiry]], typically involving a community of inquiry and its accumula ===Logical operators===5 KB (568 words) - 16:10, 4 November 2020
- ...nitary boolean function''' is a [[function (mathematics)|function]] of the form <math>f : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B},</math> where <math>\mathbb{B} = \{ 0 ===Logical operators===5 KB (589 words) - 20:24, 5 November 2015
- ...nection between the different subjects as expressed in the propositional ''form''. What I mean by “everything that can be removed from the pred ...ose we attempt to remove more from the predicate and put the last into the form “— exercises the function of relate of the relation — to8 KB (1,058 words) - 04:08, 10 November 2015
- ...>\{ \operatorname{false}, \operatorname{true} \}.</math> The names of the logical values, or ''truth values'', are commonly abbreviated in accord with the eq ...ent a truth function by a [[boolean function]], that is, a function of the form <math>f : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B},</math> where <math>k\!</math> is a n16 KB (2,190 words) - 03:25, 30 October 2015
- Every categorical proposition can be reduced to one of four logical forms. These are: ...roposition, the universal affirmative (''universalis affirmativa''), whose form in Latin is 'omne S est P', usually translated as 'every S is P'.9 KB (1,495 words) - 09:18, 19 January 2010
- ...in [[propositional calculus]] that is commonly expressed in the following form: ...eirce's law is represented by means of the following formal equivalence or logical equation.11 KB (1,526 words) - 04:14, 18 November 2015
- ...mpasses a specific logical [[function (mathematics)|function]], a specific logical [[relation (mathematics)|relation]], and the various symbols that are used Close approximations to the concept of logical implication are expressed in ordinary language by means of linguistic forms16 KB (2,147 words) - 20:18, 4 November 2015
- Pragmaticism was originally enounced<sup>2</sup> in the form of a [[maxim]], as follows: Consider what effects that might ''conceivably * [[Logical graph]]2 KB (254 words) - 04:12, 24 January 2008
- ...es underlying the algebra of sets, boolean algebra, [[boolean functions]], logical connectives, monadic predicate calculus, [[propositional calculus]], and se ...''(0,0)). Such a sequence, perhaps in another order, and perhaps with the logical values ''F'' and ''T'' instead of the boolean values 0 and 1, respectively,10 KB (1,357 words) - 16:04, 8 November 2015
- ...ons]], along with ''semiotic'' and the plural variants of both terms. The form ''semeiotic'' is often used to distinguish Peirce's theory, since it is les ===Logical operators===9 KB (1,162 words) - 20:54, 3 November 2015
- * The first excerpt appears in the form of a dictionary entry, intended as a definition of ''pragmatism''. Pragmaticism was originally enounced in the form of a maxim, as follows: Consider what effects that might ''conceivably'' h12 KB (1,764 words) - 04:32, 17 November 2015
- * [[Laws of Form]] * [[Logical graph]]2 KB (200 words) - 14:26, 5 September 2017
- JA: Problem 1. Each of the three claims has the form of an A-ism, in other words, their subjects are not the grammatical sorty o ...but they typically include (1) the formulation of hypotheses that meet the logical criterion of contingency, defeasibility, or falsifiability and the closely3 KB (528 words) - 21:58, 25 January 2008
- This is yet another variant of the previous form, with <math>\operatorname{d}x</math> denoting small changes contemplated in That's the basic idea. The next order of business is to develop the logical side of the analogy a bit more fully, and to take up the elaboration of som5 KB (906 words) - 18:12, 9 May 2008
- <td style="border-bottom:1px solid black"><math>\mathrm{Classical~Form}</math></td> <td style="border-bottom:1px solid black"><math>\mathrm{Alternate~Form}</math></td>396 KB (47,606 words) - 03:22, 26 April 2012
- ...aterial, let's begin with a consideration of higher order propositions and logical operators that stem from the ordinary propositions on 1 and 2 variables. ...,</math> and logical conjunctions, expressed as concatenated tuples of the form <math>e_1 ~ \ldots ~ e_k,</math> as the sole expression-forming operations105 KB (15,890 words) - 03:12, 4 July 2013
- ...ath> is a logical connective that says “just one false” of its logical arguments. The first four cases are described below. If the list of arguments is empty, as expressed in the form <math>\nu(),~\!</math> then it cannot be true that exactly one of the argum23 KB (3,337 words) - 13:54, 3 September 2017