Difference between revisions of "Talk:Logical graph"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday October 25, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to searchJon Awbrey (talk | contribs) |
Jon Awbrey (talk | contribs) (logical equivalence problem from the drexel math forum) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Place for Discussion== | ==Place for Discussion== | ||
| − | <math>\ldots\ | + | <br><math>\ldots</math><br> |
| + | |||
| + | ==Logical Equivalence Problem== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=6513648&tstart=0 Problem posted by Mike1234 on the Discrete Math list at the Math Forum]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://mathforum.org/kb/plaintext.jspa?messageID=6514666 Solution posted by Jon Awbrey, working by way of logical graphs]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | Date: 30 Nov 2008, 2:00 AM | ||
| + | Author: Jon Awbrey | ||
| + | Subject: Re: logical equivalence problem | ||
| + | |||
| + | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o | ||
| + | |||
| + | required to show: ~(p <=> q) is equivalent to (~q) <=> p | ||
| + | |||
| + | in logical graphs, the required equivalence looks like this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | q o o p q o | ||
| + | | | | | ||
| + | p o o q o o p | ||
| + | \ / | | | ||
| + | o p o o--o q | ||
| + | | \ / | ||
| + | @ = @ | ||
| + | |||
| + | we have a theorem that says: | ||
| + | |||
| + | y o xy o | ||
| + | | | | ||
| + | x @ = x @ | ||
| + | |||
| + | see: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Logical_graph#C2.__Generation_theorem | ||
| + | |||
| + | applying this twice to the left hand side of the required equation: | ||
| + | |||
| + | q o o p pq o o pq | ||
| + | | | | | | ||
| + | p o o q p o o q | ||
| + | \ / \ / | ||
| + | o o | ||
| + | | | | ||
| + | @ = @ | ||
| + | |||
| + | by collection, the reverse of distribution, we get: | ||
| + | |||
| + | p q | ||
| + | o o | ||
| + | pq \ / | ||
| + | o o | ||
| + | \ / | ||
| + | @ | ||
| + | |||
| + | but this is the same result that we get from one application of | ||
| + | double negation to the right hand side of the required equation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | QED | ||
| + | |||
| + | Jon Awbrey | ||
| + | |||
| + | PS. I will copy this to the Inquiry List: | ||
| + | http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ | ||
| + | since I know it preserves the trees. | ||
| + | |||
| + | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
Revision as of 03:44, 2 December 2008
Notes & Queries
- Jon Awbrey 20:20, 1 February 2008 (PST)
Place for Discussion
\(\ldots\)
Logical Equivalence Problem
Date: 30 Nov 2008, 2:00 AM
Author: Jon Awbrey
Subject: Re: logical equivalence problem
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
required to show: ~(p <=> q) is equivalent to (~q) <=> p
in logical graphs, the required equivalence looks like this:
q o o p q o
| | |
p o o q o o p
\ / | |
o p o o--o q
| \ /
@ = @
we have a theorem that says:
y o xy o
| |
x @ = x @
see: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Logical_graph#C2.__Generation_theorem
applying this twice to the left hand side of the required equation:
q o o p pq o o pq
| | | |
p o o q p o o q
\ / \ /
o o
| |
@ = @
by collection, the reverse of distribution, we get:
p q
o o
pq \ /
o o
\ /
@
but this is the same result that we get from one application of
double negation to the right hand side of the required equation.
QED
Jon Awbrey
PS. I will copy this to the Inquiry List:
http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
since I know it preserves the trees.
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o