A typical Wikipediot - Revision history

Kolobok at 21:33, 24 December 2014

2014-12-24T21:33:27Z

Kolobok at 20:19, 25 August 2013

2013-08-25T20:19:35Z

Kolobok at 19:54, 25 August 2013

2013-08-25T19:54:32Z

Kolobok at 18:30, 25 August 2013

2013-08-25T18:30:51Z

Kolobok at 18:29, 25 August 2013

2013-08-25T18:29:35Z

Kolobok at 02:44, 20 August 2013

2013-08-20T02:44:19Z

Kolobok: Pardon me, Beeblebox, but that is the most stupid thing anybody has done on this project for quite a long time

2013-07-24T23:08:00Z

Pardon me, Beeblebox, but that is the most stupid thing anybody has done on this project for quite a long time

Kolobok at 17:00, 11 April 2012

2012-04-11T17:00:27Z

Kolobok at 16:22, 24 March 2012

2012-03-24T16:22:38Z

Kolobok at 16:19, 24 March 2012

2012-03-24T16:19:13Z

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Often a typical Wikipediot is a troll: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=473564491 "When I masturbate in public, I don't really feel any different than when I do it in private; can you possibly tell us why when you masturbate in public, it hurts? Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 19:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)"]
 A typical Wikipediot has difficulties expressing himself in English. Instead he speaks a language of Wikipedia policies, for example: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=346214235&oldid=346208135 “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV and WP:Consensus are given sway. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC) “]. Don’t even try to understand what does “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV blah, blah, blah” means, but WP:Consensus basically means that a typical Wikipediot strongly believes that Wikipedia articles should be edited in accordance with an equal collaboration of the ignorant and the educated. Sometimes a typical Wikipediot says something that is hard to understand even to another typical Wikipediots: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reviewing&diff=368292310&oldid=368292188 "PC is a protection tool against V, CV, LT/PAs/libel and BLP,....Gwen Gale (talk) 01:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)"]
@@ Line 24: / Line 26: @@
 Usually a typical Wikipediot is stupid, and sometimes this stupidity progresses to the point that it becomes oblivious even to another typical Wikipediots [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=prev&oldid=562675698 "In a situation where this whole matter is best ignored and given minimal attention, Beeblebrox has decided to open a request for arbitration. Pardon me, Beeblebox, but that is the most stupid thing anybody has done on this project for quite a long time."]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 25 August 2013
Line 15:		Line 15:

	A typical Wikipediot [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/ would block one thousand innocent bystanders to silence a single man who's not even editing Wikipedia]		A typical Wikipediot [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/ would block one thousand innocent bystanders to silence a single man who's not even editing Wikipedia]
		+
		+	A typical Wikipediot [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Philippe_%28WMF%29&offset=20120121204400&limit=500&target=Philippe+%28WMF%29 spends hours giving barnstars to other Wikipediots]

	A typical Wikipediot believes everybody must love Wikipedia, and treats anything he is incapable of understanding as an expression of the animosity towards Wikipedia no matter how ridicules it makes him to look:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=485415958 “It is screamingly obvious he is making a big deal about his birthday not because he doesn't want it published, but because he hates Wikipedia.Beeblebrox (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)”]		A typical Wikipediot believes everybody must love Wikipedia, and treats anything he is incapable of understanding as an expression of the animosity towards Wikipedia no matter how ridicules it makes him to look:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=485415958 “It is screamingly obvious he is making a big deal about his birthday not because he doesn't want it published, but because he hates Wikipedia.Beeblebrox (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)”]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 25 August 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:

	A typical Wikipediot believes that [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-525571/Wikipedia-founder-used-website-dump-lover--SHE-used-eBay-revenge.html Wikipedia is the best place to dump his lover.]		A typical Wikipediot believes that [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-525571/Wikipedia-founder-used-website-dump-lover--SHE-used-eBay-revenge.html Wikipedia is the best place to dump his lover.]
		+
		+	Often a typical Wikipediot has no job, no life and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Mark_Arsten&offset=20130822154410&limit=500&target=Mark+Arsten spends every waking hour editing Wikipedia].

	A typical Wikipediot will argue for any stupidity as long as there is a “source” to prove it, no matter how disgraceful that source might be: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARush_Limbaugh&action=historysubmit&diff=250714664&oldid=250714280 “The source says, "Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts..." The reports don't seem to be hoax, is all I'm saying. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)”]		A typical Wikipediot will argue for any stupidity as long as there is a “source” to prove it, no matter how disgraceful that source might be: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARush_Limbaugh&action=historysubmit&diff=250714664&oldid=250714280 “The source says, "Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts..." The reports don't seem to be hoax, is all I'm saying. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)”]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 A typical Wikipediot has difficulties expressing himself in English. Instead he speaks a language of Wikipedia policies, for example: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=346214235&oldid=346208135 “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV and WP:Consensus are given sway. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC) “]. Don’t even try to understand what does “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV blah, blah, blah” means, but WP:Consensus basically means that a typical Wikipediot strongly believes that Wikipedia articles should be edited in accordance with an equal collaboration of the ignorant and the educated. Sometimes a typical Wikipediot says something that is hard to understand even to another typical Wikipediots: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reviewing&diff=368292310&oldid=368292188 "PC is a protection tool against V, CV, LT/PAs/libel and BLP,....Gwen Gale (talk) 01:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)"]
-A typical Wikipediot believes that [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-525571/Wikipedia-founder-used-website-dump-lover--SHE-used-eBay-revenge.html Wikipedia is the right place to dump his lover.]
+A typical Wikipediot believes that [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-525571/Wikipedia-founder-used-website-dump-lover--SHE-used-eBay-revenge.html Wikipedia is the best place to dump his lover.]
 A typical Wikipediot will argue for any stupidity as long as there is a “source” to prove it, no matter how disgraceful that source might be: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARush_Limbaugh&action=historysubmit&diff=250714664&oldid=250714280 “The source says, "Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts..." The reports don't seem to be hoax, is all I'm saying. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)”]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 A typical Wikipediot has difficulties expressing himself in English. Instead he speaks a language of Wikipedia policies, for example: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=346214235&oldid=346208135 “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV and WP:Consensus are given sway. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC) “]. Don’t even try to understand what does “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV blah, blah, blah” means, but WP:Consensus basically means that a typical Wikipediot strongly believes that Wikipedia articles should be edited in accordance with an equal collaboration of the ignorant and the educated. Sometimes a typical Wikipediot says something that is hard to understand even to another typical Wikipediots: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reviewing&diff=368292310&oldid=368292188 "PC is a protection tool against V, CV, LT/PAs/libel and BLP,....Gwen Gale (talk) 01:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)"]
 A typical Wikipediot will argue for any stupidity as long as there is a “source” to prove it, no matter how disgraceful that source might be: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARush_Limbaugh&action=historysubmit&diff=250714664&oldid=250714280 “The source says, "Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts..." The reports don't seem to be hoax, is all I'm saying. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)”]
 A typical Wikipediot believes everybody must love Wikipedia, and treats anything he is incapable of understanding as an expression of the animosity towards Wikipedia no matter how ridicules it makes him to look:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=485415958 “It is screamingly obvious he is making a big deal about his birthday not because he doesn't want it published, but because he hates Wikipedia.Beeblebrox (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)”]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 20 August 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Most of the time a typical Wikipediot is a well established [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians Wikipedian], often an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrator]. A typical Wikipediot is usually obsessed with his self-righteous authority, and in most cases is a bully. A typical Wikipediot sees his purpose in enforcing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines Wikipedia policies] no matter how stupid and how irrelevant they are, and sincerely believes there's no life outside Wikipedia. A typical Wikipediot will submit to no expert, no matter how famous one is, because [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=205586789 "One may be an expert in one's field, but not an expert in collaborative, volunteer development of an open encyclopedia using wiki software. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)"]		Most of the time a typical Wikipediot is a well established [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians Wikipedian], often an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrator]. A typical Wikipediot is usually obsessed with his self-righteous authority, and in most cases is a bully. A typical Wikipediot sees his purpose in enforcing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines Wikipedia policies] no matter how stupid and how irrelevant they are, and sincerely believes there's no life outside Wikipedia. A typical Wikipediot will submit to no expert, no matter how famous one is, because [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=205586789 "One may be an expert in one's field, but not an expert in collaborative, volunteer development of an open encyclopedia using wiki software. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)"]

		+	Often a typical Wikipediot is a troll: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=473564491 "When I masturbate in public, I don't really feel any different than when I do it in private; can you possibly tell us why when you masturbate in public, it hurts? Y u no be Russavia ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) 19:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)"]

	A typical Wikipediot has difficulties expressing himself in English. Instead he speaks a language of Wikipedia policies, for example: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=346214235&oldid=346208135 “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV and WP:Consensus are given sway. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC) “]. Don’t even try to understand what does “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV blah, blah, blah” means, but WP:Consensus basically means that a typical Wikipediot strongly believes that Wikipedia articles should be edited in accordance with an equal collaboration of the ignorant and the educated. Sometimes a typical Wikipediot says something that is hard to understand even to another typical Wikipediots: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reviewing&diff=368292310&oldid=368292188 "PC is a protection tool against V, CV, LT/PAs/libel and BLP,....Gwen Gale (talk) 01:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)"]		A typical Wikipediot has difficulties expressing himself in English. Instead he speaks a language of Wikipedia policies, for example: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGwen_Gale&action=historysubmit&diff=346214235&oldid=346208135 “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV and WP:Consensus are given sway. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC) “]. Don’t even try to understand what does “PoV is allowed, so long as WP:NPOV blah, blah, blah” means, but WP:Consensus basically means that a typical Wikipediot strongly believes that Wikipedia articles should be edited in accordance with an equal collaboration of the ignorant and the educated. Sometimes a typical Wikipediot says something that is hard to understand even to another typical Wikipediots: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Reviewing&diff=368292310&oldid=368292188 "PC is a protection tool against V, CV, LT/PAs/libel and BLP,....Gwen Gale (talk) 01:37, 16 June 2010 (UTC)"]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 24 July 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:

	A typical Wikipediot spends little or no time adding encyclopedic content to Wikipedia. He sees his purpose [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heidi_Montag&diff=286163050&oldid=286162601 in reverting other editors who do], and, if a typical Wikipediot happens to be an administrator,he [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Gwen+Gale&page=User%3AFunguy06&year=2009&month=December&tagfilter= will block an encyclopedic content contributor as "vandalism only" account].		A typical Wikipediot spends little or no time adding encyclopedic content to Wikipedia. He sees his purpose [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heidi_Montag&diff=286163050&oldid=286162601 in reverting other editors who do], and, if a typical Wikipediot happens to be an administrator,he [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Gwen+Gale&page=User%3AFunguy06&year=2009&month=December&tagfilter= will block an encyclopedic content contributor as "vandalism only" account].
		+
		+	Usually a typical Wikipediot is stupid, and sometimes this stupidity progresses to the point that it becomes oblivious even to another typical Wikipediots [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=prev&oldid=562675698 "In a situation where this whole matter is best ignored and given minimal attention, Beeblebrox has decided to open a request for arbitration. Pardon me, Beeblebox, but that is the most stupid thing anybody has done on this project for quite a long time."]
		+

	Typical Wikipediots are turning Wikipedia into a "Tyranny of the Ignorant".		Typical Wikipediots are turning Wikipedia into a "Tyranny of the Ignorant".

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 11 April 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:

	A typical Wikipediot will argue for any stupidity as long as there is a “source” to prove it, no matter how disgraceful that source might be: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARush_Limbaugh&action=historysubmit&diff=250714664&oldid=250714280 “The source says, "Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts..." The reports don't seem to be hoax, is all I'm saying. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)”]		A typical Wikipediot will argue for any stupidity as long as there is a “source” to prove it, no matter how disgraceful that source might be: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARush_Limbaugh&action=historysubmit&diff=250714664&oldid=250714280 “The source says, "Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts..." The reports don't seem to be hoax, is all I'm saying. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)”]
		+
		+	A typical Wikipediot believes everybody must love Wikipedia, and treats anything he is incapable of understanding as an expression of the animosity towards Wikipedia no matter how ridicules it makes him to look:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=485415958 “It is screamingly obvious he is making a big deal about his birthday not because he doesn't want it published, but because he hates Wikipedia.Beeblebrox (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)”]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 24 March 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:


−	Most of the time a typical Wikipediot is a well established [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians Wikipedian], often an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrator]. A typical Wikipediot is usually obsessed with his self-righteous authority, and in most cases is a bully. A typical Wikipediot sees his purpose in enforcing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines Wikipedia policies] no matter how stupid and how irrelevant they are, and ~~truly~~ believes there's no life outside of Wikipedia. A typical Wikipediot will submit to no expert, no matter how famous one is, because [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=205586789 "One may be an expert in one's field, but not an expert in collaborative, volunteer development of an open encyclopedia using wiki software. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)"]	+	Most of the time a typical Wikipediot is a well established [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians Wikipedian], often an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrator]. A typical Wikipediot is usually obsessed with his self-righteous authority, and in most cases is a bully. A typical Wikipediot sees his purpose in enforcing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines Wikipedia policies] no matter how stupid and how irrelevant they are, and sincerely believes there's no life outside Wikipedia. A typical Wikipediot will submit to no expert, no matter how famous one is, because [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=205586789 "One may be an expert in one's field, but not an expert in collaborative, volunteer development of an open encyclopedia using wiki software. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)"]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 24 March 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:


−	Most of the time a typical Wikipediot is a well established [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians Wikipedian], often an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrator]. A typical Wikipediot is usually obsessed with his self-righteous authority, and in most cases is a bully. A typical Wikipediot sees his purpose in enforcing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines Wikipedia policies] no matter how stupid and how irrelevant they are.A typical Wikipediot will submit to no expert, no matter how famous one is, because [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=205586789 "One may be an expert in one's field, but not an expert in collaborative, volunteer development of an open encyclopedia using wiki software. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)"]	+	Most of the time a typical Wikipediot is a well established [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians Wikipedian], often an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrator]. A typical Wikipediot is usually obsessed with his self-righteous authority, and in most cases is a bully. A typical Wikipediot sees his purpose in enforcing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines Wikipedia policies] no matter how stupid and how irrelevant they are, and truly believes there's no life outside of Wikipedia. A typical Wikipediot will submit to no expert, no matter how famous one is, because [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=205586789 "One may be an expert in one's field, but not an expert in collaborative, volunteer development of an open encyclopedia using wiki software. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)"]