MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday October 16, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
104 bytes removed
, 13:44, 16 October 2007
Line 377: |
Line 377: |
| </blockquote> | | </blockquote> |
| | | |
− | ===Commentary Note 7===
| + | NB. On account of the fact that various listservers balk at Peirce's "marks of reference" I will make the following substitutions in Peirce's text: |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | : @ = dagger symbol |
− | NB. On account of the invideous circumstance that various
| + | : # = double dagger |
− | listservers balk at Peirce's "marks of reference" -- or is
| + | : || = parallel sign |
− | it only the Microsoft Cryptkeeper's kryptonizing of them? --
| + | : $ = section symbol |
− | I will make the following substitutions in Peirce's text:
| + | : % = paragraph mark |
| | | |
− | @ = dagger symbol
| + | It is clear from our last excerpt that Peirce is already on the verge of a graphical syntax for the logic of relatives. Indeed, it seems likely that he had already reached this point in his own thinking. |
− | # = double dagger
| |
− | || = parallel sign
| |
− | $ = section symbol
| |
− | % = paragraph mark
| |
| | | |
− | It is clear from our last excerpt that Peirce is already on the verge
| + | For instance, it seems quite impossible to read his last variation on the theme of a "giver of a horse to a lover of a woman" without drawing lines of identity to connect up the corresponding marks of reference, like this: |
− | of a graphical syntax for the logic of relatives. Indeed, it seems
| |
− | likely that he had already reached this point in his own thinking.
| |
− | | |
− | For instance, it seems quite impossible to read his last variation on the | |
− | theme of a "giver of a horse to a lover of a woman" without drawing lines | |
− | of identity to connect up the corresponding marks of reference, like this: | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| o---------------------------------------o | | o---------------------------------------o |
| | | | | | | |