Difference between revisions of "Directory talk:The Wikipedia Point of View/FT2 on Animal Films"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday April 20, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Reply to Ockham)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
::* Allow this page to be crawled by search engine spiders?  (Note: it already is.)
 
::* Allow this page to be crawled by search engine spiders?  (Note: it already is.)
 
::Looking forward to your response. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 05:59, 27 November 2008 (PST)
 
::Looking forward to your response. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 05:59, 27 November 2008 (PST)
 +
::: The first - but Wikipedia Review was what I had in mind, not really mainstream.  However the link appears to have failed.  I'll leave it to your judgment, Greg! Best [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)
 +
::: By the way, it is being identified by the NetSense things as porn - interesting.  Are you sure it's Ok to have it on your website?  [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)

Revision as of 22:19, 27 November 2008

Google cache

I find it interesting that a Google search for the quoted phrase, "most common in equine pornography where it's easier and safer" returns only one result: the UCSC Wikipedia Trust Project. But if you follow their link, the result is a page that obviously has been oversighted by the staff of the UCSC project. Apparently, FT2 has "connections" to get this sort of under-the-rug-sweeping accomplished. That won't happen here at MyWikiBiz, short of a court-ordered notice. -- MyWikiBiz 10:25, 26 November 2008 (PST)

Hi thanks - can we make this public? Ockham 04:54, 27 November 2008 (PST)
By "public", you mean?
  • Publicize this situation to the mainstream media?
  • Convert this page to an "open" all-users-may-edit document? (Note: just copy it to Main Space.)
  • Allow this page to be crawled by search engine spiders? (Note: it already is.)
Looking forward to your response. -- MyWikiBiz 05:59, 27 November 2008 (PST)
The first - but Wikipedia Review was what I had in mind, not really mainstream. However the link appears to have failed. I'll leave it to your judgment, Greg! Best Ockham 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)
By the way, it is being identified by the NetSense things as porn - interesting. Are you sure it's Ok to have it on your website? Ockham 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)