Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday March 29, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 77: Line 77:
 
== [[Worcester Cathedral Library]] ==
 
== [[Worcester Cathedral Library]] ==
  
* Q13 - transcribed by John Aston, a monk of Worcester who studied at Gloucester college, Oxford, the Benedictine predecessor of the present Worcester college, in 1294-5.
+
* Q13 - transcribed by John Aston, a monk of Worcester who studied at Gloucester college, Oxford, the Benedictine predecessor of the present Worcester college, in 1294-5. The manuscript is confidently dated no later than 1295, and probably as early as 1270<ref>Ebbesen 1987, 136 and Lewry 1985</ref>
 
** [[Roger Bacon]] ''Summa grammatica'' (cf Peterhouse 191).
 
** [[Roger Bacon]] ''Summa grammatica'' (cf Peterhouse 191).
 
** Anon, commentary on ''Analytica Priora''.
 
** Anon, commentary on ''Analytica Priora''.
 
** [[Peter of Cornwall]], two ''sophismata''.
 
** [[Peter of Cornwall]], two ''sophismata''.
 
** Questions on the ''Physica''
 
** Questions on the ''Physica''
** ''sophisma - nihil est verum nisi in hoc instanti'' - included in a group of ''sophismata'' some of which are ascribed to John of Berwick, master in Oxford c. 1290<ref>A.G. Little & F. Pelster, ''Oxford Theology and Theologians AD 1282-1302'' Oxford 1934</ref>
+
** ''sophisma - nihil est verum nisi in hoc instanti'' - included in a group of ''sophismata'' some of which are ascribed to John of Berwick, master in Oxford c. 1290<ref>Little & Pelster 1934</ref>
 +
 
 +
== References ==
 +
 
 +
* A.G. Little & F. Pelster, ''Oxford Theology and Theologians AD 1282-1302'' Oxford 1934
 +
* Lewry, P.O. (ed.), 1985, The Rise of British Logic: Acts of the Sixth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics , Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto.
 +
* Ebbesen, Sten, 1987, “Talking about what is no more. Texts by Peter of Cornwall, Richard of Clive, Simon of Faversham and Radulphus Brito,” Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 55, Copenhague.
 +
 
  
 
== Notes ==
 
== Notes ==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 11:41, 1 February 2009

Corpus Christi

Bodleian

  • Auct F. 5 23
  • Canon Lat. 278
  • Canon misc. 278
  • Digby 2 - the author's name is given at the end of the compendium on the categories as 'Willelmus fratrum de Montoriel'.
    • commentary on Isagoge
    • commentary on Perihermenias
    • commentary on Praedicamenta.
  • Digby 24 - Sophisma Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit, Magister Abstractionum.
  • Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning Innata est nobis, probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by Boethius of Dacia, and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the condemnations of 1277.
  • Digby 204
  • Lat misc. e 108

Corpus Christi

  • Corpus Christi 119
  • Corpus Christi 250
  • Corpus Christi 293b

Merton

New College

  • New College 285

Peterhouse

  • Peterhouse 152 Anon., Utrum haec sit vera, 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente, ms. Cambridge (49ra –vb); ed. A. Zimmermann, in 'Eine anonyme Quaestio: 'Utrum haec sit vera 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente', Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 49 (1967), p. 184-8.
  • Peterhouse 191: Roger Bacon's Summa Gramatica and Robert Kilwardby's Priscian commentary.
  • Peterhouse 205: Questions on the Elenchi
  • Peterhouse 206

Caius

  • Caius 344/540
  • Caius 434/434
    • Walter Burley, Some leaves containing most of De exclusivis (1r-6r), beginning of De exclusivis. All of De exceptivis, and the beginning of De obligationibus are lost, the remainder of De obligationibus (7r-10r). For De insolubilibus, Bradwardine's Insolubilia is substituted (10-13), De suppositionibus (13-19). Heytesbury's De significationibus propositionum multiplicium (19-21), Anonymous Sophismata and Obligationes.
  • Caius 448/409
  • Caius 509/386
  • Caius 512/543
    • Questions on the Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum by John of Felmingham
    • William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the Perihermenias
    • Walter Burley, Questions on the Posterior Analytics.
  • Caius 611/341
    • Unascribed question on the Elenchi by an author Sten Ebbesen has called 'The Englishman'[1]. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the Elenchi may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981.
  • Caius 612/543
  • Caius 668/645

Pembroke

  • Pembroke 193

Cambridge University Library

  • Kk3

Worcester Cathedral Library

  • Q13 - transcribed by John Aston, a monk of Worcester who studied at Gloucester college, Oxford, the Benedictine predecessor of the present Worcester college, in 1294-5. The manuscript is confidently dated no later than 1295, and probably as early as 1270[2]
    • Roger Bacon Summa grammatica (cf Peterhouse 191).
    • Anon, commentary on Analytica Priora.
    • Peter of Cornwall, two sophismata.
    • Questions on the Physica
    • sophisma - nihil est verum nisi in hoc instanti - included in a group of sophismata some of which are ascribed to John of Berwick, master in Oxford c. 1290[3]

References

  • A.G. Little & F. Pelster, Oxford Theology and Theologians AD 1282-1302 Oxford 1934
  • Lewry, P.O. (ed.), 1985, The Rise of British Logic: Acts of the Sixth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics , Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto.
  • Ebbesen, Sten, 1987, “Talking about what is no more. Texts by Peter of Cornwall, Richard of Clive, Simon of Faversham and Radulphus Brito,” Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 55, Copenhague.


Notes

  1. ^ Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', Synthese, xl (1979)
  2. ^ Ebbesen 1987, 136 and Lewry 1985
  3. ^ Little & Pelster 1934