Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday March 29, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 38: Line 38:
 
== Peterhouse ==
 
== Peterhouse ==
  
 +
* Peterhouse 152 Anon., Utrum haec sit vera, 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente, ms. Cambridge (49ra –vb); ed. A. Zimmermann, in 'Eine anonyme Quaestio: 'Utrum haec sit vera 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente', Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 49 (1967), p. 184-8.
 
* Peterhouse 191: [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summa Gramatica'' and [[Robert Kilwardby]]'s Priscian commentary.
 
* Peterhouse 191: [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summa Gramatica'' and [[Robert Kilwardby]]'s Priscian commentary.
 
* Peterhouse 205: Questions on the ''Elenchi''
 
* Peterhouse 205: Questions on the ''Elenchi''

Revision as of 12:29, 31 January 2009

Corpus Christi

Bodleian

  • Auct F. 5 23
  • Canon Lat. 278
  • Canon misc. 278
  • Digby 2 - the author's name is given at the end of the compendium on the categories as 'Willelmus fratrum de Montoriel'.
    • commentary on Isagoge
    • commentary on Perihermenias
    • commentary on Praedicamenta.
  • Digby 24 - Sophisma Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit, Magister Abstractionum.
  • Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning Innata est nobis, probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by Boethius of Dacia, and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the condemnations of 1277.
  • Digby 204
  • Lat misc. e 108

Corpus Christi

  • Corpus Christi 119
  • Corpus Christi 250
  • Corpus Christi 293b

Merton

New College

  • New College 285

Peterhouse

  • Peterhouse 152 Anon., Utrum haec sit vera, 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente, ms. Cambridge (49ra –vb); ed. A. Zimmermann, in 'Eine anonyme Quaestio: 'Utrum haec sit vera 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente', Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 49 (1967), p. 184-8.
  • Peterhouse 191: Roger Bacon's Summa Gramatica and Robert Kilwardby's Priscian commentary.
  • Peterhouse 205: Questions on the Elenchi
  • Peterhouse 206

Caius

  • Caius 344/540
  • Caius 434/434
    • Walter Burley, Some leaves containing most of De exclusivis (1r-6r), beginning of De exclusivis. All of De exceptivis, and the beginning of De obligationibus are lost, the remainder of De obligationibus (7r-10r). For De insolubilibus, Bradwardine's Insolubilia is substituted (10-13), De suppositionibus (13-19). Heytesbury's De significationibus propositionum multiplicium (19-21), Anonymous Sophismata and Obligationes.
  • Caius 448/409
  • Caius 509/386
  • Caius 512/543
    • Questions on the Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum by John of Felmingham
    • William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the Perihermenias
    • Walter Burley, Questions on the Posterior Analytics.
  • Caius 611/341
    • Unascribed question on the Elenchi by an author Sten Ebbesen has called 'The Englishman'[1]. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the Elenchi may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981.
  • Caius 612/543
  • Caius 668/645

Pembroke

  • Pembroke 193

Cambridge University Library

  • Kk3

Notes

  1. ^ Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', Synthese, xl (1979)