Section Contents:- Crossovers are taking over for a reason.(More...)
- All SUV reviews include comparisons, interior and exterior analysis, options & features, and test drives.(More...)
Crossovers are taking over for a reason. Most consumers don't really need the advantages body-on-frame construction provides, and the resultant poor gas mileage is certainly unattractive in these $3-per-gallon times. There are two types of SUVs that inhabit this price point.
[3] The all-new Nissan Rogue is also compelling for suburbanites who are willing to sacrifice some utility for a lot of style and a very carlike drive. The Jeep Compass and Patriot have received lots of attention, but they challenge the term "SUV" by essentially being restyled versions of the Dodge Caliber hatchback. Both offer poor interior quality, limited interior space and unrefined powertrains. Although they cost less than other compact crossovers, you get what you pay for.
[3] Old-school, body-on-frame SUVs offer superior towing capabilities and usually better off-road performance, but suffer in terms of on-road handling, ride quality, interior space and general refinement.
[3] A crossover is broadly defined as an SUV that features carlike unibody construction. In general, this increases interior room, betters the driving experience and reduces weight (which improves fuel economy and agility).
[3] Amongst the "old guard" of SUVs are the Dodge Durango, Ford Explorer, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Nissan Pathfinder and Toyota 4Runner. Each is a nameplate that helped create the SUV craze in the 1990s, and there's no denying they maintain some of their original appeal. The Hummer H3 and Jeep Commander (larger than the Grand Cherokee and technically a crossover) also fall into this category.
[3] The lines between car, truck, SUV and crossover are becoming increasingly blurry.
[3] Each is comfortable and has made great strides over earlier SUVs in terms of on-road civility. Plus, when there's a boat or a U-Haul to pull, they provide the type of towing capacity that crossovers simply can't match.
[3] The Sequoia, in particular, is worth a look, as it matches GM's entries strength for strength, while offering unprecedented seating flexibility thanks to fore/aft adjustable second-row seats coupled with a fold-flat third row. Compact and midsize luxury models constitute the other type of SUV in this category.
[3] At the top of the M-Class line is the ML63 AMG, a tuner variant that competes with other seemingly oxymoronic high-performance SUVs like Land Rover's Range Rover Sport, VW's Touareg V10 TDI and the Porsche Cayenne.
[3] Want to read more? Gosh, where do I begin? I've been tempted to include stories about growing up in the 70's in the snowbelt outside of Buffalo, NY and how we managed to survive - kids, pets, and all in a simple CAR! Or about how much I laughed when all those idiots broke their SUV axels trying to plow through snowbanks (just like they had seen in the commercials!) a few years ago when a big storm hit Chicago.
[4] Switching from an average new car to a 13 mpg SUV for a year would waste more energy than leaving a refrigerator door open for six years, a bathroom light burning for 30 years, or a color TV turned on for 28 years.
[4] Depite great improvements in recent years, California's air quality still violates health-based state and federal air quality standards in regions throughout the state. When emissions standards were originally set in California for "light trucks," including SUVs, these vehicles were primarily used for work purposes. Less stringent emissions standards were created for these vehicles because they were presumed to have more rigorous operating conditions.
[4] Today, light trucks (including SUVs) are almost 50% of the vehicles in California. This unprecedented growth in sales has seriously altered the light truck vehicle emissions category and has had a disastrous effect on air quality. Jerry Martin, spokesperson for the CARB has said that " are the station wagons of the '90's (because) they're being used as cars, we feel they ought to be regulated as cars."
[4] SUVs are three times more likely to kill the occupants in a rollover. Light trucks/SUVs crashing into cars accounts for the majority of fatalities in vehicle-to-vehicle collisions, 2,000 people would still be alive if their vehicles had been hit by a heavy car instead of an SUV.
[4] An average SUV or a pickup is more than twice as likely as a car to kill the driver of the other vehicle in a collision.
[4] Am I way off base? Of course I think not. Even if you are driving a "small" SUV, you're still contributing to the industry that produces these wasteful machines instead of fuel-efficient vehicles.
[4] Ah, so you made it to the bottom, I'm proud of you. Perhaps I've underestimated you? THANK YOU for taking the time to read this and to care about the many problems to which buying and driving an SUV contributes. Please forward this to as many people as possible.
[4] Now can't you agree that SUVs really suck? And I'm not normally a person who likes to use that "suck" word.
[4] "SUV owners want to be more like 'I'm in control of the people around me."' This is an important reason why seats are mounted higher in sport utilities than in minivans, he said.
[4] http://slate.msn.com/Features/GodzillaSUV/page2.asp
http://slate.msn.com/Features/GodzillaSUV/page2.asp ("It's been said that SUV owners are selfish, gluttonous, even anti-social. That's exactly the customer we are looking for--and we're finding more every day! After all, somebody is going to hog the road and waste gasoline. It might as well be you.")
[4] Since 1990, the inefficiency of light trucks (including SUVs) have led to Americans wasting an extra 70 billion gallons of gasoline. How automakers save money with SUVs: They decided in the mid-1980s that they were going to build more light trucks to take advantage of all the regulatory loopholes and were able to do so very cheaply, even though they didn't have a lot of truck engineers.
[4] SUVs can spew 30+ percent more carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons and 75+ percent more nitrogen oxides than passenger cars.
[4] Federal law permits SUVs to waste 33 percent more gasoline than passenger cars.
[4] SUVs spew out 43 percent more global-warming pollutants - 28 pounds of carbon dioxide per gallon of gas consumed - and 47 percent more air pollution than the average car, using 1 million barrels of oil a day.
[4]
All SUV reviews include comparisons, interior and exterior analysis, options & features, and test drives. [5] Whatever your needs, you'll find first-hand impressions and professional opinions about the new SUV models that most interest you like the popular new Dodge Nitro or the Chevrolet Suburban.
[5] HELP! Choosing an SUV is too hard! Here's what I need it for.
[5] Summary Summary The Mercedes-Benz M-Class SUV is just the right size and is set u.
[5] 